EDSOC513-20A (NET)

Educational Thought

30 Points

Edit Header Content
Division of Education
Te Kura Toi Tangata School of Education

Staff

Edit Staff Content

Convenor(s)

Lecturer(s)

Administrator(s)

: helen.findlay@waikato.ac.nz
: nia.sugiharto@waikato.ac.nz

Placement/WIL Coordinator(s)

Tutor(s)

Student Representative(s)

Lab Technician(s)

Librarian(s)

: alistair.lamb@waikato.ac.nz
: melanie.chivers@waikato.ac.nz
: yilan.chen@waikato.ac.nz

You can contact staff by:

  • Calling +64 7 838 4466 select option 1, then enter the extension.
  • Extensions starting with 4, 5, 9 or 3 can also be direct dialled:
    • For extensions starting with 4: dial +64 7 838 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 5: dial +64 7 858 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 9: dial +64 7 837 extension.
    • For extensions starting with 3: dial +64 7 2620 + the last 3 digits of the extension e.g. 3123 = +64 7 262 0123.
Edit Staff Content

Paper Description

Edit Paper Description Content

Educational Thought is often viewed as a discipline removed from the more concrete issues that pedagogy and policy offer, yet it is increasingly relevant to the examination of those issues. This paper firstly aims to come to grips with some of the ‘macro’ aspects of education – that is, the location of education within wider philosophical orientations that are not always associated with the discipline of education. Secondly, we look specifically at the ‘micro’ level of philosophical assumption as it emerges in the learning contexts and through policy. In both instances, we aim to apply the work of theorists, and active thinking about their relevance to important educational issues in order to address (perhaps not resolve) important issues of educational concern.

Aims:

This paper aims to:

  • locate diverse philosophies within 'schools of educational thought';
  • apply selected philosophies to concepts in educational theory and practice;
  • critically explore the assumptions that underlie contemporary educational theory and practice;
  • encourage students to explore areas of education that fascinate them and to explore them philosophically;
  • implement the basic tenets of university scholarship, critical reflection and research at the masters level.

Objectives:

At the end of this paper students, given participation with online and face-to-face teaching, and the completion of core and additional readings and tasks, should be able to (in anticipation of the standard of masters level):

  • Identify, understand and critically discuss philosophical approaches studied in the paper in relation to key educational issues;
  • Articulate why and how at least one of these approaches could be applied to an area of interest within educational practice.
Edit Paper Description Content

Paper Structure

Edit Paper Structure Content

This paper will be delivered online.

Edit Paper Structure Content

Learning Outcomes

Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Students who successfully complete the paper should be able to:

  • Identify, understand and critically discuss philosophical approaches studied in the paper in relation to key educational issues
    Linked to the following assessments:
  • Articulate why and how at least one of these approaches could be applied to an area of interest within educational practice.
    Linked to the following assessments:
Edit Learning Outcomes Content
Edit Learning Outcomes Content

Assessment

Edit Assessments Content

If you are having difficulties meeting the requirements please let me know in advance. Feel free to contact me by email if you are having any problems generally.

There is an overall aim of the assessments, and that is to take a problem that you’ve observed in any aspect of education and to apply relevant philosophers to it, both to identify the problem and to address possible resolutions.

Edit Additional Assessment Information Content

Assessment Components

Edit Assessments Content

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0. There is no final exam. The final exam makes up 0% of the overall mark.

The internal assessment/exam ratio (as stated in the University Calendar) is 100:0 or 0:0, whichever is more favourable for the student. The final exam makes up either 0% or 0% of the overall mark.

Component DescriptionDue Date TimePercentage of overall markSubmission MethodCompulsory
1. Online discussions
15
  • Online: Moodle Forum Discussion
2. Philosophers’ conversation: Seminar
8 May 2020
6:30 PM
45
3. Critical essay
12 Jun 2020
6:30 PM
40
  • Online: Submit through Moodle
Assessment Total:     100    
Failing to complete a compulsory assessment component of a paper will result in an IC grade
Edit Assessments Content

Required and Recommended Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

Required Readings

Edit Required Readings Content

The following is available as an online resource via our library:

Blake, N., Smeyers, P., Smith, R. & Standish, P. (2003). The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education. Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Edit Required Readings Content

Recommended Readings

Edit Recommended Readings Content

Pring, R. (2015). Third edition: Philosophy of educational research. Bloomsbury.

Johnson, H. (1963) A philosophy of education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

There is a wide range of educational philosophy literature in the Education Library, and more general philosophical literature in the General Library. You are also encouraged to read from the journal Educational Philosophy of Education which you have access to through the library site.

Edit Recommended Readings Content

Online Support

Edit Online Support Content
This paper is delivered by moodle
Edit Online Support Content

Workload

Edit Workload Content
200 hours
Edit Workload Content